domainwatch.org

Wednesday August 23 2006

Rafferty’s rules (Blair Rafferty)

Filed under: Blair Rafferty, Domains Australia — Josh @ 7:22 pm

Rafferty’s rules
http://www.theage.com.au/news/business/when-a-test-match-turns-to-ashes/2006/08/22/1156012542788.html?page=fullpage

” …

Ian Porter and Nabila Ahmed
August 23, 2006

FULL DISCLOSURE

Rafferty’s rules

THIS is an alert for the citizens of the wild west, otherwise known as Western Australia.

We believe they are about to have in their midst one Blair Rafferty, proprietor of Domains Australia Pty Ltd, a company that recently came to the attention of auDA, the domain names administrator in Australia.

It seems Domains Australia has come up with a digital-age twist on the David Tweed method of blanket-mailing unsuspecting targets in the hope that 1 or 2 or 3 per cent of them will bite.

Rafferty’s company has been snail mailing or faxing everyone who operates a com.au domain name offering to register a net.au equivalent for just $225. Plus you get a free MP3 player for each registration.

Many people have contacted auDA complaining that their new domain names have not been registered. What’s more, they’re not getting their MP3 players, either.

In a consumer alert issued this week, auDA pointed out that Domains Australia was not an accredited registrar or a reseller for an accredited registrar.

The administrator is familiar with the Rafferty name, having successfully taken legal action against Chesley Rafferty, brother of Blair, under the Trade Practices Act.

So, if you are still waiting for your shiny, new domain name and have suddenly started experiencing a terrible sinking feeling in your stomach, auDA suggests that you contact the ACCC.

In contrast to the snail mail way in which your problem started, you can at least lodge an electronic complaint form on the ACCC website.

… “

Tuesday August 22 2006

Domain name entrepreneur goes west (Blair Rafferty)

Filed under: NZ Domain Registration, Blair Rafferty, DomainName.com.au — Josh @ 7:18 pm

Domain name entrepreneur goes west
http://www.theage.com.au/news/biztech/domain-name-entrepreneur-goes-west/2006/08/21/1156012473234.html

” …

Domain name entrepreneur goes west
By NICK MILLER
August 22, 2006

Domain name entrepreneur Blair Rafferty has a spectacular view from his office on the 50th floor of a Melbourne high-rise but doesn’t seem to have enjoyed it. After receiving a shot across the bows last week from .au domain name administrator auDA, and an injunction from a New Zealand court, he appears to have moved to Perth and gone into the mobile phone business.

Mr Rafferty, 24, is the younger brother of bankrupt Chesley Rafferty, who was successfully sued in 2003 by the ACCC for sending out letters that looked like invoices inviting people to register domain names.

Last month we reported that Chesley appeared to have handed on the “family business” to Blair. Last Wednesday auDA issued a “consumer alert” on Blair’s business dealings, concerned that he was sending letters to domain name registrants offering to register the .net.au equivalent of their .com.au domain, plus a free MP3 player.

The auDA says the letters may mislead people into believing they are renewing an existing domain rather than buying a new one. The $225 charge is much higher than the going rate, and numerous customers complained that the .net.au domains were not registered and MP3 players not sent.

The auDA is taking legal advice on whether it can take civil action against the younger Mr Rafferty, auDA chief Chris Disspain says. The ACCC has also received complaints but would not say if it was investigating them. The Age tried unsuccessfully to contact Blair Rafferty at the Collins Street offices of DomainName.com.au.

Last Monday Justice Hansen of the New Zealand High Court froze the local local accounts of Mr Rafferty’s company NZ Domain Registration Ltd and ordered the company to stop soliciting domain name registrations.

ASIC records reveal Mr Rafferty last month registered three new businesses in Perth: Aussie Messenger, Fun Messages and Ausmobiles.com.

… “

Friday August 18 2006

auDA Consumer Alert: Domains Australia (Blair Rafferty)

Filed under: Blair Rafferty, Domains Australia — Josh @ 9:14 pm

The Australian Domain Name Administrator, .auDA, has issued a consumer alert to .au domain name registrants by email.

” …

From: consumeralert@auda.org.au
To: undisclosed-recipients
Date: 18-Aug-2006 20:44
Subject: CONSUMER ALERT from auDA, The Australian Domain Name Administrator

You are receiving this email because your email address is listed as the registrant contact address for a .au domain name. Please do NOT reply to this email.

auDA has become aware that Domains Australia Pty Ltd is sending letters and/or faxes to some domain name registrants offering to arrange registration of the net.au equivalent of the registrants com.au domain name for $225.

The letter is headed .DOMAIN NAME AVAILABLE. and some versions of it offer a free MP3 player with each registration.

auDA has received numerous complaints which indicate that; 1. despite the net.au name being paid for, it is NOT being registered and 2. registrants are NOT receiving the .free. MP3 player.

Based on the complaints received auDA is concerned that the letters may mislead people into believing that they are renewing their existing com.au domain name when in fact they are purchasing a new net.au name.

Further, consumers should be aware that $225 for a net.au domain name is significantly higher than prices charged by auDA accredited registrars and their resellers.

Domains Australia Pty Ltd is a company controlled by Blair Rafferty, the brother of Chesley Rafferty. It is NOT an auDA accredited registrar nor is it a reseller of an auDA accredited registrar.

auDA has previously successfully taken legal action against Chesley Rafferty and companies controlled by him under the Trade Practices Act.

If you have paid Domains Australia Pty Ltd and the domain name has not been registered or you have not received the .free. MP3 player and you wish to lodge a formal complaint, auDA advises that you immediately contact the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) either by lodging an electronic complaint at http://www.accc.gov.au/ or by faxing it to their Canberra office on
(02) 6243 1199. Alternatively you may wish to contact your State based fair trading or consumer affairs office.

A similar mass mail out has also occurred in New Zealand. New Zealand Domain Registration Ltd, owned by Blair Rafferty, was recently exposed on a New Zealand television program Fair Go. To view this video please http://tvnz.co.nz/view/video_popup_windows_skin/816241.

For more information see http://www.auda.org.au.

auDA
www.auda.org.au
info@auda.org.au

… “

Thursday August 17 2006

NZ Domain Registration High Court Injunction (Blair Rafferty)

Filed under: NZ Domain Registration, Blair Rafferty — Josh @ 9:28 pm

InternetNZ, through the Office of the Domain Name Commissioner, has obtained an interim injunction against NZ Domain Registration Limited.

NZ Domain Registration Ltd
http://www.dnc.org.nz/story/30259-29-1.html

” …

Further Update:

InternetNZ, through the Office of the Domain Name Commissioner (DNC), has obtained an interim injunction against NZ Domain Registration Limited (NZDRL). The injunction relates to NZDRL’s recent mass mail out. A copy of the Court’s order may be read here.

Money or cheques forwarded to NZDRL as a result of a recent mass mail out will be held in New Zealand pending the court’s final decision about whether NZDRL’s actions are legal or illegal.

The DNC wants any people who responded by mistake to NZDRL to get their money back. The DNC also wants to make sure that NZDRL gets domain names for the people who did mean to respond - if the domain names are still available.

In the Court proceedings the DNC claims that: NZDRL’s offers of .nz domain names look like invoices; NZDRL’s offers are likely to mislead or deceive recipients into paying them by mistake; NZDRL appears to be controlled from Western Australia; The DNC wants, at least, to have all responses to the offers held in New Zealand until everyone who has responded to them has confirmed whether or not they meant to try to register a new domain name.

NZDRL has not yet advised the Court of its full responses to the DNC’s claims. NZDRL has claimed that its offers are made in good faith and that its offer of a free MP3 player remains good.

The DNC notes that NZDRL’s offer does not ask for sufficient information to allow a .nz domain name to be registered.

NZDRL is not an authorised .nz registrar (or a reseller for an authorised ..nz registrar). NZDRL has not already registered the .nz domain names that it is offering to members of the public.

People who accept NZDRL’s offer may find that the domain name they want has been registered to someone else before NZDRL could get it. The .nz registry operates online on a “first come, first served” basis.

The DNC still encourages people to be cautious when deciding what action to take in respect of NZDRL’s notices.

… “

Wednesday August 16 2006

CONSUMER ALERT: Domains Australia Pty Ltd Mass Mail Out (Blair Rafferty)

Filed under: Blair Rafferty, Domains Australia — Josh @ 8:40 pm

Mass mail out by Domains Australia Pty Ltd
http://www.auda.org.au/consumeralert/consumeralert-16082006/

” …

Mass mail out by Domains Australia Pty Ltd

16/Aug/2006

auDA has become aware that Domains Australia Pty Ltd is sending letters and/or faxes to some domain name registrants offering to arrange registration of the net.au equivalent of the registrants com.au domain name for $225.

The letter is headed ‘DOMAIN NAME AVAILABLE’ and some versions of it offer a free MP3 player with each registration.

auDA has received numerous complaints which indicate that;

1. despite the net.au name being paid for, it is NOT being registered and
2. registrants are NOT receiving the ‘free’ MP3 player.

Based on the complaints received auDA is concerned that the letters may mislead people into believing that they are renewing their existing com.au domain name when in fact they are purchasing a new net.au name.

Further, consumers should be aware that $225 for a net.au domain name is significantly higher than prices charged by auDA accredited registrars and their resellers.
Domains Australia Pty Ltd is a company controlled by Blair Rafferty, the brother of Chesley Rafferty. It is NOT an auDA accredited registrar nor is it a reseller of an auDA accredited registrar.

auDA has previously successfully taken legal action against Chesley Rafferty and companies controlled by him under the Trade Practices Act.

If you have paid Domains Australia Pty Ltd and the domain name has not been registered or you have not received the ‘free’ MP3 player and you wish to lodge a formal complaint, auDA advises that you immediately contact the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) either by lodging an electronic complaint at http://www.accc.gov.au/ or by faxing it to their Canberra office on (02) 6243 1199. Alternatively you may wish to contact your State based fair trading or consumer affairs office.

… “

auDA in new domain stoush
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,20150135%5E15317%5E%5Enbv%5E,00.html

” …

auDA in new domain stoush
Andrew Colley
AUGUST 16, 2006

AUSTRALIA’S peak internet name authority auDA has marched into another regulatory stoush with another business linked to bankrupt former domain registrar operator Chesley Rafferty.

AuDA took legal action against Domain Names Australia a company directed by Mr Rafferty’s in the Federal Court in 2003 for breaches of trade practice laws.

The domain regulator today issued a warning concerning promotional material distributed by a company run by Mr Rafferty’s brother, Blair.

It said that the company, Domains Australia, was an unaccredited registrar and that it had received numerous complaints about the company’s activities.

Domains Australia had offered .com.au domain owners a free MP3 player for registering the .net.au version of their domain name, auDA said.

However, auDA said that some Domain Australia customers had not received registration services or the MP3 player despite having paid $225 for the service.

Chris Disspain, chief executive of auDA said the matter should be handled by consumer protection agencies but revealed that the regulator was seeking its own legal advice.

The domain regulator also expressed concerns over the wording of the letters which bear the title “DOMAIN NAME AVAILABLE”.

“Based on the complaints received auDA is concerned that the letters may mislead people into believing that they are renewing their existing com.au domain name when in fact they are purchasing a new net.au name,” auDA said.

AuDA issued similar warnings concerning Domain Names Australia’s advertising practices three years ago.

At the time auDA said that DNA had sent to domain owners letters warning them that their .au names were unavailable or unregistered and that they could easily be mistaken for invoices.

… “

Domain name reminder - ACCC
http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/758612/fromItemId/142

” …

Domain name reminder

They are also the subject of perennial complaints to the ACCC.

To avoid making unnecessary payments, or in the extreme being scammed, business administration staff are reminded to read domain name renewal letters carefully. The letter you have received may be an offer for a new domain name.

If you receive such letters the following tips may help:

* Check the details of your current domain name
* Know who your current domain name registrar is
* Note the renewal date for your domain name

For more information on domain name issues see the ACCC’s fact sheet Domain name renewal/registrations—don’t get caught.
Related Internet links

* Domain name renewal/registrations—don’t get caught

… “

Next Page »

Disclaimer: The domainwatch.org page has been developed using publicly available information. While due care has been exercised to ensure the accuracy and currency of the material contained on this web page, the editor strongly recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use and seek professional advice where appropriate. While the information provided is considered to be true and correct at the date of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of the information. The editor will consider requests to correct factual errors if accompanied by reasonable proof of the error(s). © Copyright 2001-2005 - Josh Rowe - josh@email.nu - Powered by WordPress